Klamath Water Cutoff Dispute
Finally Gets Scientific Look
SACRAMENTO, Calif. —(AP)— The chairman of a National Academy of
Sciences panel reviewing the government's decision to withhold water
from farms in the Klamath Basin hopes it can help soothe the emotional
dispute.
``Scientific judgment always involves uncertainty,'' said William
M. Lewis of the University of Colorado. ``That's where a committee
that is well-balanced and doesn't have a particular chip (on its
shoulder) can help the government, help the vested interests, get a
clear review of where the uncertainties are and how big they are.''
Lewis, a biologist specializing in the ecosystems of lakes and
rivers, also farms land outside Boulder, Colo.
The committee he heads meets this week in Sacramento to review the
scientific justification for withholding water from a federal
irrigation project in the Klamath Basin in order to keep endangered
fish alive. The decades-old irrigation project normally brings water
to some 1400 farms and ranches along the Oregon-California line.
On Tuesday, the committee will hear from federal agencies, farmers,
Indian tribes, commercial fishermen and environmentalists. An interim
report is due in January, and a final report, including suggestions
for restoring healthy fish populations, is due in a year and a half.
The conflict over competing demands for water in the Klamath Basin
came to a head in April, when federal scientists set unprecedentedly
high water levels for endangered sucker fish in Upper Klamath Lake and
threatened coho salmon in Klamath River. With runoff low from drouth,
little water was allowed into the irrigation canals.
Protesters repeatedly forced open the headgates that blocked the
flow until federal police were posted as guards.
Interior Secretary Gale Norton called on the National Academy of
Sciences to review the work of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service on
the needs of suckers and the National Marine Fisheries Service on the
needs of salmon, as well as the work of the U.S. Bureau of
Reclamation.
``I want the science explained to me on what happened,'' said John
Crawford, past president of the Klamath Water Users Association.
The Yurok Tribe, whose reservation straddles the lower Klamath
River and whose members look to salmon for their livelihoods, are
confident the decisions to dedicate more water to fish were based on
sound science, said executive director Troy Fletcher.
``Hopefully, we will get away from the issue of beating on the
scientists and move on to the bigger and more important issue of
resolving what to do about too great a demand on too little of a
supply of water,'' he said.
|