|
BLM Director Voices Support
For Traditional Uses Of Land
RENO, Nev. —(AP)— Contrary to her critics' claims, the head of
the Bureau of Land Management insists she enjoys the solitude of
federally protected wilderness just as much as the next person.
``There is something wonderfully unique about those primitive
wilderness areas,'' BLM Director Kathleen Clarke said. ``In this busy,
fast-paced world we live in where we are all wired with two or three
devices, that sort of solitude is treasured.
``But there also are many people — especially in the West — who
think those lands should be open for all types of recreation. And in
many Western communities, you also have local economies that are
dependent on their ability to access public land for grazing, mining,
logging — traditional uses.
``All those things are critical to the well-being and the quality
of life of the people who live on those lands,'' she told The
Associated Press in a recent interview.
Clarke, a lawyer and former director of the Utah Department of
Natural Resources, was appointed by President Bush in January 2002 to
be the first woman to lead the bureau, which coordinates oil and gas
mining, timber harvesting, cattle grazing and conservation on 264
million acres of federal land across the West.
She said one of the biggest changes in federal land management the
past decade is the Bush administration's emphasis on hearing the
voices of those who use public lands.
That includes growing demands for recreational uses such as
mountain biking, sand-sailing and cliff diving as well as traditional
commercial uses, she said.
``We are attempting to engage much more closely with user groups
and local communities,'' said Clarke, a former aide to the late Sen.
Wallace Bennett, R-Utah, and ex-Rep. Jim Hansen, R-Utah, who estimates
she spends about half her time outside Washington, D.C.
``I am a sincere believer that we will do a better job if we
listen,'' she said.
``I think under this secretary of the interior (Gale Norton) there
is a very, very firm commitment to working with local people as well
as national groups to understand what is the best management scheme
for the land.''
Many of those local user groups say the early stages of her efforts
have been a great success.
``She is looking to us for suggestions as to how best manage the
resource. That's kind of a new feeling,'' said John Falen, an Orvada
rancher who is chairman of public lands issues for the Nevada
Cattlemen's Association. ``In the previous administration,
(then-Interior Secretary) Bruce Babbitt was out to get us. He made a
pretty successful stab at it.''
Critics say the talk of inclusion doesn't apply to activist groups
pushing to put more BLM land off-limits to commercial activity,
including oil and gas drilling.
``From our perspective, they are simply reaching out to those
constituents that have a financial interest in the exploitation of
publicly owned resources — those constituencies being the oil, coal,
hardrock mining, livestock and logging industries,'' said Dave
Alberswerth, a public policy specialist for The Wilderness Society.
Of all the federal land management agencies, the BLM has the least
percentage of its land locked up in wilderness, just 6.5 million acres
or less than three percent of the land it manages, Alberswerth said.
That compares with 34 million acres of wilderness across the Forest
Service's 191 million acres of national forests.
``So wilderness can't really be too important to her,'' Alberswerth
charged.
``The highest priority for this administration in terms of public
land management is oil and gas development. Protecting environmental
values, cultural values, wildlife habitat — that all takes a back
seat,'' he said.
Clarke said it's not fair to compare the BLM to other federal
agencies, such as the Forest Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(20 percent wilderness) or National Park Service (42 percent
wilderness).
``The BLM is unique to other federal land management agencies in
that it has the mandate under our laws to work to develop oil, gas and
minerals on public lands for the benefit of the nation — to add
wealth to the treasury and promote the standard of our economy,'' she
said.
(BLM also administers mainly lands that were not considered
valuable enough in the first place to be part of a national forest or
special refuge. The Wilderness Society knows that, and knows as well
that its efforts to draw parallels are bogus. That the group does so
anyway reveals much about its credibility. — Ed.)
Earlier this month, the Bush administration directed federal land
managers to remove obstacles to oil and gas development in parts of
five Rocky Mountain states.
``We are trying to seek ways to very sensitively develop those
resources to meet the demands of this nation. About one-third of the
consumed energy resources in this country come off public lands,''
Clarke said.
``I'd like to see the debate change from energy versus environment,
to how we manage energy resources in an environmentally sensitive
way.''
The same goes for recreation, she said, from dune buggies to
parachutes.
``We continue to have new extreme sports — people who want to
dive off cliffs on public lands. I went wind-sailing on BLM land. I
didn't even know that sort of sport existed,'' Clarke said.
``We didn't have mountain bikes 20 years ago. Now we manage how
mountain bikes will access the land in places like Moab (Utah) and
Grand Junction (Colorado). There seems to be a new trend every two or
three years.
``All those things have impacts on public lands. We need to balance
that recreation with the impacts.''
While demands for recreation will continue to grow, Clarke said
traditional users such as ranchers should not be fearful of being run
off the land.
``I personally believe that grazing is an important use of public
land, one that is clearly defined by the BLM,'' she said.
``If we were to eliminate public lands grazing, there are other
things at risk. Ranchers often have a base of land that is privately
owned that constitutes prime wildlife habitat — winter range for elk
and deer that winter on private lands and spend summers on public
lands.
``If we eliminate their ability to make a living grazing, many will
sell out,'' she said. ``We have seen many important riparian areas,
winter wildlife range, start to go into decline or go into condos or
ranchettes, which causes fragmentation of habitat.
``It behooves us to support these activities.''
|