|
Economist Recommends Managing
Risk For Certain Commodities
By Jose G. Peña
Extension Economist
Price bids for most major agricultural commodities continue to
improve and the market outlook appears encouraging, but markets could
weaken.
Corn is trading at near life-of-contract highs, cotton markets are
slightly above last week's lows, futures price bids for cattle appear
to have recovered all of the "mad cow" disease-induced
market decline, and even poultry is trading at record high prices.
Recent improvements in the live cattle market appear to have been
influenced by Mexico reopening its borders to U.S. beef exports.
While no one can accurately predict the market with a high degree
of certainty, it appears that price bids are near the top in relation
to the latest supply/demand information and may be starting to trade
sideways, especially for corn and cotton. Producers should seriously
consider establishing some price base protection, either through cash
forward contracts or with a selective hedging mode in the futures
market.
The recent market improvement appears export-driven, especially for
corn and cotton. Export-driven markets tend to be more erratic,
thereby increasing the price risk for producers, merchants,
cooperatives and everyone who owns or uses a commodity in their trade
or business.
Futures price bids for corn dropped slightly on Tuesday, March 16,
when this report was prepared, after reaching life of contract highs
of around $3-$3.09 per bushel for most 2004 futures contracts on the
board, indicating sideways trading. Futures price bids for most 2004
cotton contracts reached life-of-contract highs last October,
weakened, strengthened, and now appear to be trading sideways in the
65 to 67-cent range.
As corn, sorghum and cotton planting gains momentum, farmers are
encouraged to consider implementing some price base risk management
protection for their cash price. Direct payments will help income, but
it appears doubtful that farm program counter-cyclical payments will
be significant, except maybe for cotton.
This market rally will probably attract most market traders to sell
contracts in an attempt to capture potential profits from downward
movement. In terms of corn, world supplies are tight and increased
demand appears to be fueling this market rally. Futures price bids
could weaken as demand works through the record large 10.114
billion-bushel U.S. corn crop.
The cotton market appears even more vulnerable, since almost 76
percent of the 2003/04 crop is export-bound and U.S. cotton exports
account for more than a 60 percent share of the world cotton export
trade.
Recent market improvement could spark increased corn, sorghum and
soybean plantings and, depending on weather, could increase production
and carry-over stocks in the 2004/05 season. Plantings and weather
conditions in major producing areas this spring and summer will play a
critical role in the direction of agricultural markets.
The market is already anticipating increased production as futures
price bids for the new crop show weakness, compared to price bids for
the old crop. The first survey-based planting intentions report for
spring-planted crops will be released on March 31 by USDA and will be
critical to market direction. Ending stocks for most crops are
estimated to be quite low for the 2003/04 season, and markets could
become volatile by the start of the new harvest if yield estimates, as
the new season progresses, vary too far above or below trend yields.
Meanwhile, after weeks of planting delays this spring due to wet
fields in Texas, dry, mild weather this past week allowed some
producers to finish planting corn and sorghum. Late plantings are
causing concerns for increased production risk if dry weather returns,
as was the case from November through early March, and temperatures
rise early this spring as they did two years ago.
In addition, high energy prices will boost production costs sharply
in 2004. Energy costs have increased 15-20 percent during the last few
weeks and will cause an increase in all related input costs such as
fertilizer, transportation, electricity, chemicals, etc. As a result,
it becomes imperative to implement price risk management alternatives
which will help protect cash prices and improve income.
A risk management program should focus on the concept of revenue
risk protection by forward pricing through hedging and/or forward
contracts and the use of crop insurance to protect production.
Producers should establish a price by going short [selling a
contract(s)] in the futures market. Buying a PUT will establish a
price floor at the strike price (less premium, commissions and the
time value of money) while keeping upward price movement potential
open.
Keep in mind that as prices increase past the loan rate,
counter-cyclical payments decrease by a like amount. In addition, CC
payments only cover 85 percent of base yields. Production above the
base yield is only protected to the loan rate with LOPs.
As national average prices rise above that value, CC payments
cease. While prices for most farm program commodities are already
above the loan rate for the commodity, a CALL option [right to
purchase a futures contract(s)] could be used to protect CC payments
if prices are expected to rise but stay below the national price rate,
which would eliminate a CC payment. At the current strike price,
cotton appears to be the only commodity where a CALL option could save
CC payments. This alternative becomes more critical when futures
prices drop to 55 cents or below.
Some would argue that since CC payments are settled at the end of
the national marketing year for a particular season and commodity,
which may be as much as 12-15 months after planting for South Texas,
the time value of the money tied up in a CALL option may be higher
than the value the CALL will protect. While this may be true, keep in
mind that the producer would be protecting the cash value of the crop.
Keep in mind as well that CALL options based on futures price bids for
December or March would cover most of the price risk, since by then
most of the new harvest is in and prices tend to stabilize.
Cotton
After dropping to the upper 20s during fall '01, price bids for
cotton commodity futures contracts have been gradually showing
strength and are now trading in the 65-67 cent range for 2004
contracts. A reduction in U.S. carry-over stocks from very high levels
three seasons ago has probably influenced the market improvement.
The world cotton situation is also bullish to the market, as world
stocks have declined. While the "A" index weakened this past
week and the Adjusted World Price, which is used to calculate loan
deficiency payments, dropped about two cents to about 58 cents per
pound, the "A" index and the AWP are still bumping the highs
of the last three years.
At harvest time for south Texas, the cash price for base loan
quality cotton is usually six to seven cents below December futures.
Currently, a simple strategy of using PUT options could set a floor
cash price of about 50.5 cents, net of premium and expected basis
(e.g. a 59 Put at a two-cent premium less average basis of about 6.5
cents).
Some would argue that this transaction would be irrelevant since
the farm bill protects to the loan rate of 52 cents per pound with the
marketing loan program. While the protection is true, keep in mind
that this transaction would protect a drop in the cash price. The
marketing loan program would protect to the loan rate, but total
revenue would be lower without this protection if local cash prices
drop below the loan rate. This is especially relevant for the producer
who plants cotton and is concerned about a severe drop in prices
because of another large crop. There are other pricing strategies that
may need to be considered, such as a window.
|