Livestock Losses Still Unclear
From Early Blizzard On Plains
By David Bowser
The Southeastern Colorado cattle industry was still
trying to determine the death loss this week from a
blizzard that ripped through the state the last weekend
of October.
Southeastern Colorado, Southwest Kansas and the
Oklahoma Panhandle appear to have borne the brunt of the
first blizzard of the year. The Texas Panhandle and
Nebraska escaped relatively unscathed.
"I don't even care to guess at the number lost in
Nebraska but it would be way, way less than we're hearing
south and west of here," says Jeff Stolle with the
Nebraska Cattlemen's Association.
Estimates in Colorado range from 15,000 to 30,000 head
of cattle lost in the blizzard. The Texas Panhandle
reported fewer than 1000 head lost to the storm.
"Most of the ranchers here that were running a
1000 or more head of cattle, they lost 250 of them,"
says Bruce Gum of the Guymon Livestock Auction.
"That's kind of been the percentage."
Gum says one feedyard northeast of Guymon lost about
438 head, while another west of the city lost more than
1100 head of cattle.
"You get west toward Texhoma and one rancher who
had 500 steers turned out lost 156 of them," Gum
says. "Another had 480 steers, and he lost 135. It's
just been that kind of story all along."
The storm apparently was most severe from just south
of Guymon north to the Nebraska border.
"You get south of us 35 miles and it didn't seem
to be too bad," Gum says.
Paul Hitch of Guymon-based Hitch Enterprises says they
lost between 1150 and 1200 head in their three feedyards.
Two of the yards are in the Guymon area. One is near
Garden City, Kansas.
"The Kansas lot was the least damaged,"
Hitch says. "It was one of those things where the
long-term damage to the actual facilities is going to be
minimal. As far as having major problems with pen
conditions, it isn't going to work that way because it
turned off bright and sunny and warm. It wasn't a huge
amount of snow that fell. It was like four or five
inches.
"The problem," Hitch continues, "was
that there was a huge amount of wind pushing it around.
It piled cattle up in the pens, and we had significant
death loss. That's not going to be fun. There's sure
going to be some lost performance on these cattle, but
we'll make some of it up. We're now making some of it
up."
Both Oklahoma and Texas feedyards report that bright
sunny days and pleasant fall conditions this week are
minimizing the long-term effects.
While the Colorado Department of Agriculture is
officially estimating between 10,000 and 15,000
casualties lost to the storm, it acknowledges that its
estimates may be low. Snow still covers the Colorado
landscape in many places, making it difficult to get an
accurate count.
"I've heard estimates anywhere from 15,000 to
30,000, but I don't think anybody really knows,"
says Janet Jackson with the Colorado Department of
Agriculture.
"We are expecting it to go to the 30,000
range," says Todd Inglee of the Colorado Cattlemen's
Association.
Most of those losses will be cattle.
"Right now they haven't located many sheep,"
Inglee says. "There aren't a lot of sheep grazing in
that part of the state, so about 97 percent of the loss
is cattle."
There are not a lot of firm numbers, Inglee admits.
"A lot of people still can't get out to where
their cattle were," he explains.
Barb Wilkinson with the Colorado Cattle Feeders says
her family ranches in Southern Colorado, and they haven't
been able to get out to all their cattle.
"There are still huge amounts of snow out
there," she says.
Cattle losses on the Colorado-Kansas border have kept
crews busy as they remove the dead livestock.
"We have 40 to 50 semi-loads a day" of
carcasses coming in, said James Davis of National
Byproducts Inc., a rendering company with facilities in
Denver and Wichita, Kan.
The loads have been moving at that rate all week, he
said.
The drifting snow buried fences and cattle were
scattered. There was one report, she says, of cattle that
wandered 42 miles from home in the storm.
"There were 52 of them that walked from Lamar to
Springfield," Wilkinson says. "They found them
on the runway of the airport in Springfield."
Press reports say the airport was closed but the
runways had been plowed, leaving them open and relatively
sheltered by the piled snow.
While cattlemen in Colorado were counting their
losses, ranchers and feeders in Nebraska and Texas were
counting their blessings.
"Our cattle recovered fairly quickly in most
cases," Stolle says. "We are showing quite a
few more cattle this week in the feedyard than we were
last week."
Stolle says the worst part of the storm went south of
Nebraska.
"There are areas in Nebraska that did receive
anywhere from a foot to two feet of snow, but we were
somewhat lucky from the aspect that there were some major
concentrations of cattle in our major feeding areas that
really came through pretty well," Stolle says.
"The Lexington-Cozad area got four or five inches of
snow and the wind blew and it was pretty tough for a
while, but they didn't get the foot-plus of snow. In the
West Point-Wizner area, which is up in northeast
Nebraska, a major concentration of feeding up there, they
escaped almost unscathed. They had just an inch or two of
snow."
Burt Rutherford with the Texas Cattle Feeders
Association says it appears the severe portion of the
storm was north of the Canadian River, and Texas losses
were relatively light.
Although Amarillo reported strong winds and a dusting
of snow on Saturday, Oct. 25, the following day was
bright and sunny.
"From some of the stories we've heard out of
Western Kansas, we feel like we were fortunate,"
Stolle says.
"The good news if there is any is that it didn't
last a long time, and it turned off beautiful after the
storm passed," Hitch says. "We'll have a chance
to heal before real winter gets here. It's not going to
be one of those things where you have to fight the
aftermath until April. It ain't going to work that
way."
|