Father Of "Green
Revolution"
Blasts Environmental Fringe
DES MOINES, Iowa Thirty years ago, farmers in
India and Pakistan learned to feed their countries in a
stunning reversal of agricultural practices known as the
Green Revolution.
Norman Borlaug was synonymous with that revolution,
and he won the 1970 Nobel Peace Prize for his efforts.
Now the color green has come to represent just the
opposite approach. Instead of agricultural productivity,
it symbolizes environmental activism led by people
Borlaug calls loudmouth extremists whose lives have
become too soft thanks to the technology they like to
protest.
At 83 and impatient to expand food production in
Africa, Borlaug is furious that the "greenies,"
as he calls them, have so much influence.
"They say that if we don't use fertilizers, we
don't use insecticides, maybe we'd live a little
longer," Borlaug said. "That's misguided. I'm
very fearful that the general public doesn't recognize
what demagoguery in science can do."
Borlaugs displeasure doesnt faze the
junk-science activists any more than the proven success
of his techniques impresses them.
"He's a nice old man who is trying to protect his
Nobel Peace Prize," says Pat Mooney, dismissively.
Mooney is the director of a Canada-based outfit calling
itself the "Rural Advancement Foundation
International."
An Iowa native, Borlaug returned to Des Moines
recently for ceremonies for this year's recipients of the
World Food Prize. The award honors people who have
improved the quality and quantity of food in the world.
Borlaug said the anti-science attitude of the
environmental activists "really pinches my
innards."
The showcase for Borlaug's methods is Ethiopia, once
as hopeless as India, a country that now grows enough
grain to feed its people.
Borlaug said it is difficult overcoming political
instability and destructive farming traditions in Africa.
Environmental activists make it tougher.
"Now they talk about organic fertilizer, which is
fine. We need to use it," he said.
But replacing the 80 million tons of nitrogen
fertilizer used worldwide with organic material is
impossible, he contended.
"The equivalent would be four billion tons of
manure. How many more billion cattle would we need? What
would happen because of over-grazing?" he asked.
And how could all of those animals be fed and still
have enough to feed the humans? he wondered.
Borlaug said advanced methods, including chemicals,
allow the world to feed itself without clearing vast
forests.
"I like all of the back country. By using high
technology on the land that is suited for agriculture, we
save the land that should be left for forests and
wildlife habitat," he said.
The "green" movement, he insisted, comes
from people who have no perspective and nothing better to
do.
"It's curious that this movement started in
Europe," Borlaug said. "They are grandsons and
daughters of people who were starving in Europe during
World War II. They have no sense of history.
"They don't respect what science and technology
has done to make their life pleasant so they can run
around from one country to another," he said.
"These people have become activists because they
don't have any other challenge," he continued.
"Life has become too soft and easy. ... They make a
lot of noise, they know all the answers. Most of them
have never grown a bushel of grain in their life."
Some environmental activists claim to fear misuse of
chemicals, and Borlaug agreed it could happen.
"Yes, there are mistakes in science and
technology," he conceded. "There are going to
be accidents. But there are accidents with automobiles,
too, and we don't abandon the automobile." (Clearly,
Borlaug hasnt heard from all the activists,
including Al Gore, who want to do precisely that.
Ed.)
Borlaug was drawn out of retirement in 1984 at the age
of 71 by Ryoichi Sasakawa, a Japanese philanthropist who
has since died. Sasakawa, former President Jimmy Carter
and Borlaug formed the Sasakawa-Global 2000 Foundation,
whose goal is to bring Africa to self-sufficiency.
The foundation now runs thousands of test plots in 12
nations, showing farmers what can be done with advanced
seeds, irrigation canals, erosion control and timely
applications of fertilizers and insecticides.
In every case, Borlaug said, yields will at least
double compared to traditional methods.
While he is irritated the work has not gone faster,
Borlaug is proud of what has happened so far.
"Ethiopia five years ago was the equivalent of
the hopelessness of India back in the middle 60s
when everyone said, Why are you wasting your life
trying to do something for India? It's
hopeless," he said.
As they did in India, critics said it would be better
for Mother Nature to take over, allowing many thousands
of people to die so that resources could more closely
match demand.
But because of the intensive agriculture, the 1995-96
crop season's 15 percent increase in average yield was
the best ever, thanks mostly to the use of chemical
fertilizers, Borlaug said.
Roughly concurrent with Borlaugs Des Moines
visit came release of a report warning of vast future
famines if advanced agricultural technology is not more
widely applied.
The report, by the International Food Policy Research
Institute, also warns that El Nino weather disturbances,
civil strife, low grain stocks and declining foreign aid
could cause greater fluctuations in the supplies of
wheat, rice, corn and other cereals.
Unless action is taken to boost agricultural growth,
the report predicts that by 2020 the food gap in the
staples of most diets in developing countries is expected
to grow from the current 94 million tons to 228 million
tons.
The report says the number of malnourished children
will jump by 45 percent to 40 million in Africa south of
the Sahara desert. So many children are malnourished in
South Asia that even with a projected decrease, two out
of five children will be without enough to eat by 2020.
Ismail Serageldin, a World Bank vice president and
chairman of a World Bank-affiliated group of leading
agricultural scientists and researchers, said, "The
agricultural research community needs to give small
farmers in low-income developing countries the
technologies they need to produce more food, earn more
income and generate more jobs."
Among these technologies, he said, are seed that can
resist drouth, infectious insects and frost.
"In the next 25 years, there will be three
billion more people on the planet, 95 percent of them in
the developing countries," Serageldin said. "If
we don't intensify production at the small-farmer level
... the effects on the environment will be devastating
pressure."
|