Skeen Blocks "Heritage
River"
Plan For Rio Grande In N.M.
WASHINGTON U.S. Rep. Joe Skeen, R-N.M., has
blocked a plan to add part of the Rio Grande in southern
New Mexico to the Clinton administrations
"American Heritage Rivers" program.
Skeens action on behalf of the Rio Grande is
only the latest in a growing string of mostly
locally-inspired efforts to opt out of the ill-defined
"Heritage Rivers" scheme.
As in the other cases, Skeen complained that
designating the Rio Grande an "American Heritage
River" could infringe on water and private property
rights and expand federal power. Supporters of the
program claim such fears are unfounded, but their
inability to explain just what the plan is supposed to do
and to demonstrate with any certainty where its limits
lie has made their assurances unconvincing to critics.
Skeens office said he was notified by the
Clinton administrations Council on Environmental
Quality that the river would not be designated over his
objections. The council, among other things, advises the
president on environmental policy.
In a press release, Skeen said that "anytime the
Clinton administration proposes a new federal program,
the public is skeptical about the hidden agenda that
inspire these new initiatives."
The program, which supposedly includes no new federal
spending or regulations, is promoted as a way to
"encourage cooperation" between federal
agencies and local governments and activists to improve
rivers. Critics have noted that "encouraging
cooperation" can be done without creating an
entirely new program, particularly if as its
promoters insist the program has no teeth and no
funding anyway.
If its more than just show, they say,
theyre right to be suspicious; if its nothing
but a show, its a waste of time and effort.
Clinton announced the program in his State of the
Union address in February as a way to help communities
restore and revitalize rivers by making it easier to cut
through federal red tape. A "river navigator"
would be named to help local governments and activists
gain access to federal money and programs that could be
used to clean up rivers and revitalize water fronts.
Skeen's press release called the Rio Grande vital to
New Mexico agriculture and economic security.
"I certainly understand the concerns of my
constituents, particularly when unnecessary programs such
as the American Heritage River Initiative can have a
negative impact on private property and water
rights," he said.
"It's really an innocuous program the way I see
it," argued Kevin Bixby, director of the Southwest
Environmental Center in Las Cruces. "I know Skeen is
generally not supportive of environmental initiatives at
the federal level. In this case, I think he was
responding to some of the most extreme, right-wing
constituents."
Bixby said supporters had been told that if the Rio
Grande were nominated, it would have been on a short list
of rivers that could end up as the first 10 American
Heritage rivers.
He said it's possible supporters will try to get the
northern and central Rio Grande and the river in Texas
nominated for the program. The first designations will be
made early next year.
In Texas, Land Commissioner Garry Mauros office
is promoting the Rio Grande as a "Heritage
River," seeking out supporters in river communities
and brushing aside opponents. The agency recently hosted
an unadvertised planning meeting in out-of-the-way
Marathon to which only hand-picked supporters were
invited; city and county governments that were already on
record in opposition were allegedly told they would be
"left out of the funding" if they didnt
reverse their positions.
|