 |
|
 Choice
gleanings from 45-plus years of Unregistered Bull.
"Among the multitude of things I can't get
straight," said John, "is this tariff
proposition. Just about the time I read something that
convinces me we ought to have high protective tariffs,
then I come across a powerful argument from the other
side which makes me start wondering all over again which
is right and which is wrong.
"It's probably silly for a country boy like me to
bother about such things, but after a lifetime of leaving
it up to other people to figure 'em out, I can't see
where the experts have done such a hot job. And it's a
cinch that whatever they do about it will have some
effect on my bank account sooner or later.
"On one side, it looks perfectly simple that if
we let foreigners ship their products into this country
to compete with ours, it's not going to do us producers
here any good. But, when you go to listening to the other
side, you wonder if it's that simple. The opposition
argues that free trade and open competition has made the
United States a better country, and then they go on to
argue that free trade will, by the same token, make the
whole world a better place.
"It looks to me like we've got ourselves in a
considerable mess by financing development of industries
in foreign countries which can compete with U.S.
manufacturers. The only way we can hope to get our money
back, or even see where our money has done the foreigners
any good at all, is for the foreigners to succeed with
their industries, including the ones we've financed for
them. At the same time, we've got a good chance one of
these days to have over-production here among our own
industries. The foreign manufacturers and producers want
to sell us their goods on account of they can't sell all
their production at home. Because of our high standard of
living, we use more of everything than anybody else, but
we can also produce plenty of most things for our own
needs. We have to export a lot of goods, but the only way
we can sell 'em abroad is to buy other products abroad so
foreign countries will have money to buy our products.
"Now, if that isn't a tough problem, I never saw
one. When one domestic industry benefits by selling its
goods to foreign countries, another industry howls to
high heaven because the foreign buyer ships some of his
goods to this country.
"The problem is hard to solve, it seems, because
of the difference in the standard of living here and
abroad. It seems that free trade might boost the standard
of living of people elsewhere on earth, but it might play
the dickens with our own. On the other hand, if we don't
import anything for fear of lowering our profits and
standard of living, we don't get to export anything, and
the first thing you know you have a lot of unemployment
in this country. Which means if we're not careful we're
liable to have a lower standard of living in any case.
"However, I guess country boys like me are better
off than the majority of people, regardless of which way
the international trade winds blow. We've lived on sow
belly, beans and biscuits before and ought to be able to
do it again with just a little practice. That's the main
advantage of herding sheep or punching cattle, I guess. A
bedroll, a side of bacon and a few pounds of frijoles
have always been available in exchange for perspiration.
It's the man with clogged-up sweat glands who will suffer
most in case the economists misfigure this deal."
(S.F. 04/02/53)
|