EPA Targeting Light Trucks,
SUVs For More Regulations
WASHINGTON Stockmen may want to start pondering
how theyre going to pull a gooseneck trailer with
one of the new Volkswagen "Bugs."
Continuing Vice President Al Gores assault on
private automobiles, particularly the demonization of
light trucks and "sport utility vehicles," the
Clinton administrations Environmental Protection
Agency is threatening to tighten vehicle emissions
standards. EPA is drawing a tight bead in particular on
vehicles larger than "conventional" cars.
The agency laid the groundwork for tighter standards
last week by citing a so-called "study" that
questions whether air quality goals can be achieved
without requiring still cleaner automobiles.
The report, expected to be made public in coming
weeks, will play a critical role as the EPA develops new
tailpipe emission requirements for the next decade for
cars, including the popular sport utility vehicles.
Predictably, the "study" suggests it may be
difficult to meet federal standards for ozone and other
pollutants without additional reductions in tailpipe
emissions beyond what the auto industry already is
promising, government and private sources say.
This is in part because of expected growth in the
number of automobiles and miles traveled as well as the
continuing popularity of light trucks and sport utility
vehicles, many of which have larger engines than
dangerously downsized "conventional" passenger
cars.
Auto manufacturers recently announced they will
introduce cleaner burning vehicles beginning with 1999
models, phasing them in over several years. But
environmental activists and regulators contend EPA should
go further.
The EPA report, which the White House is reviewing, is
expected to provide rationalization for the agency as it
determines what additional auto emission controls it may
impose, industry and air pollution control experts said.
Richard Wilson, the EPA's assistant administrator for
air and radiation, declined to characterize details of
the study Friday, but said it "lays out the various
issues that EPA must consider" in developing new
tailpipe emission requirements.
"The study reaches no regulatory conclusions
regarding the level at which future standards should be
set," Wilson said in a statement.
The report, couched in terms of options and general
scenarios, prophesies that technologies will be available
in 2004 for additional emission reductions and that such
improvements can expect to be cost-effective, even when
compared with pollution reductions from other sources
such as industry and power plants.
"It starts the debate on what kind of cars we're
going to be driving in the next decade," said Nancy
Kruger of the State and Territorial Air Pollution Program
Administrators association. The group is made up of
bureaucrats with a vested interest in more regulation,
hence larger staffs and bigger budgets.
"There's going to be a big fight over it,"
Kruger predicted.
EPA plans to issue proposed regulation on so-called
"Tier II" emission standards by the end of the
year, with a final rule by the end of 1999.
The auto industry says it is moving on its own
beginning with 1999 models to produce cleaner cars
so-called "low emissions vehicles"
nationally. These cars are supposed to emit 50 percent to
70 percent less smog-causing pollution than cars now
generally being sold. Ford Motor Co. announced in January
that even its large sport utility vehicles would be
low-emission next year.
The industry's position is that the planned low
emission vehicles should satisfy the EPA's next round of
emission reductions, said Bob Babik, director of
environmental issues at the American Automobile
Manufacturers Association.
"We think its a good level. If EPA comes out and
says there's more needed, we'll have to evaluate
that," he said in an interview.
But environmental activists and many air quality
regulators contend that by 2004, new technologies will
allow for even tougher emission controls, and that the
EPA should require what's feasible.
Last week, the State and Territorial Air Pollution
Program Administrators and its local counterpart formally
urged the EPA to look beyond the industry's voluntary
clean car program in crafting its Tier II emissions
requirements.
The new standard should "reflect new and emerging
technologies ... expected to be available in 2004 and
beyond" and also require sport utility vehicles and
light trucks to meet the same emission standards as
passenger cars, the two groups said.
"There's a clear need for the EPA to set more
stringent emissions standards for cars and light
trucks" as part of its upcoming regulation, agreed
Roland Wong, a transportation specialist for the Union of
Concerned Scientists. He said the EPA study is expected
to support that conclusion.
(Of course it will "support that
conclusion." Thats why they wrote it
Ed.)
|