Vagaries Of Weather Affected
Ranch To Rail Feedlot Program
By David Bowser
AMARILLO Weather caused problems for the
1997-98 Ranch to Rail cattle program, says the
coordinator of the seven year-old project.
More than 1000 head of cattle from 103 ranches went on
feed at Randall County Feedyard between Amarillo and
Canyon beginning Oct. 21, 1997. The first blizzard to hit
the Texas Panhandle came through on Oct. 25, says Dr. Ted
McCollum, beef cattle specialist with the Texas
Agricultural Extension Service and coordinator of the
northern Texas program. A similar program is mirrored at
Hondo Creek Feedyard near Corpus Christi for the southern
part of the state.
The annual program places cattle in a feedyard setting
and allows producers to see how their cattle perform and
to get carcass trait data back on those cattle after
they've been slaughtered.
"It's an information feedback program,"
McCollum says. "It's an opportunity for cattle
producers to place their cattle in a feedyard and see the
performance of their cattle in terms of health, weight
gains and carcass traits. It's not a contest."
When the program first started in 1991, it was
conducted only in the Panhandle. About 600 head of cattle
were entered. The number of cattle peaked several years
ago at 3200 head in both north and south programs. The
last two years, it's leveled off between 1800 and 2000
head. This year there were about 1900 head in both
programs, 1019 of those in the Panhandle.
As of May 12, 690 head of the Ranch to Rail cattle
have gone to slaughter at IBP in Amarillo.
"We still have over 300 head of cattle left out
there to kill," McCollum says. "We're behind
compared to previous years."
In addition to the weather that caused performance
problems early in the feeding program, the cattle in the
program came in two weeks later last fall than they
normally do, McCollum says.
The average daily gain of the cattle early in the
period was about six-tenths of a pound less this year
than last year because of the weather.
"The weather set us back quite a bit,"
McCollum admits.
In addition to the first blizzard, the feedyard
suffered others about every 14 days until mid-March,
slowing the feeding process.
The cattle coming in last fall averaged 629 pounds.
"That is about what we run each year," he
says. "We suggest people ship them in weighing
between 500 and 800 pounds."
Despite the guidelines, however, McCollum says in the
three years he has been involved in the program, they
have never turned any cattle down for being outside those
parameters.
"On average we get them between 620 and 630
pounds," he says.
The influence of the weather upon cattle performance
shows up readily, McCollum says, when they compare the
average daily gain for the cattle from their late October
arrival through the first re-implant in January.
This year, the average daily gain was 2.84 pounds per
day compared to last year's 3.44 pounds per day. During
the same period, the cattle were fed 6.01 pounds of dry
matter for each pound they gained compared to 4.84 pounds
of dry matter for each pound they gained last year. It
took a lot of feed just to maintain body heat this winter
that was turned to gain last year.
Of the cattle slaughtered to date, final liveweights
have averaged about 1221 pounds, but the liveweight range
of those cattle has been from 910 pounds to 1540 pounds.
Carcass weights have averaged 761 pounds. The carcass
weight range is from 583 pounds to 980 pounds. The
heaviest carcass so far this year is below the heaviest
carcass they've seen in past years, an indication that at
least some of the cattle that are outside packer
parameters are being eliminated from the country's herds.
Backfat for the cattle slaughtered to date averaged
l.38 inches. Data from past programs shows an average of
four inches.
Ribeyes on the carcasses so far have averaged 13.5
square inches, ranging from 10 square inches to 17.9
square inches.
The weather during the 1997-98 program also affected
the sickness rate among the cattle this year. About 27
percent were treated at least one time for health
problems versus 18 percent the year before.
There were 274 cattle treated at least one time for
illness, for a 27 percent pull rate.
"Last year, the pull rate was about 18
percent," McCollum says.
The weather, again, seemed to be the primary factor in
the increased sickness, although McCollum admits that
vaccination rates still aren't what they should be.
In a health program developed by Ranch to Rail calling
for vaccinations 45 days prior to sending cattle to the
feedyard, many of the health problems encountered in
incoming cattle should be alleviated.
"What we've found over time is that not everybody
follows directions that we give them," McCollum
says. "We have a lot of people coming into the
program every year, and it's a learning experience for
them."
Consequently, health costs this year were up. Of the
cattle that needed to be treated, an average of $26.82
worth of medicine was pumped into them.
"That does not include processing or
vaccines," McCollum says. "This is just
antibiotics."
About three-quarters of one percent of the cattle this
year were railed for one reason or another before they
could complete the program.
About 30 percent of the cattle so far have been Yield
Grade 1. Slightly fewer than 52 percent were Yield Grade
2. Almost 18 percent were Yield Grade 3. Less than
one-half percent were Yield Grade 4.
Forty-one and a half percent of the cattle slaughtered
to date have graded Choice compared to between 30 and 35
percent in years past. Slightly more than 53 percent
graded Select, and 5.4 percent graded Standard.
Most of the data collected so far, McCollum says, is
in line with programs from the last seven years. He says
there is little change in the averages because of the new
cattlemen coming into the program.
"We get about 20 to 30 percent repeats," he
says. "We have a lot of people coming into the
program every year, and it's a learning experience for
them."
The cattle left in the program will be sent to
slaughter by May 26, McCollum says.
"Our first cattle were sent to the packing plant
at 154 days on feed," McCollum says. "Our last
cattle will go at 216 days on feed. That's the normal
spread we'll see for Ranch to Rail cattle."
To participate in the program, producers must consign
a minimum of five head, McCollum says. The cattle in the
Ranch to Rail North program are fed at Friona Industries'
Randall County Feedyard north of Canyon and slaughtered
at IBP's beef packing plant northeast of Amarillo. The
Ranch to Rail South cattle are fed at Hondo Creek Feeders
north of Corpus Christi and are slaughtered at Sam Kane's
packing plant at Corpus Christi.
All the carcass data for the north program is
collected by Dr. Ted Montgomery with the Carcass Data
Service at West Texas A&M University at Canyon.
"We use the federal-state marketing service to
assign a value to those cattle when they enter the
program each fall," McCollum says.
The program is sponsored by the Texas A&M
Department of Animal Science, the Extension Service,
Texas Purebred Cattle Alliance, and Texas Cattle Feeders
Association.
|