 Labor
Day weekend always marks a rite of passage for students.
Some are headed for Techs or A&Ms, whilst others seek
more isolated environs. Ones pickup truck will be
crammed with clothes, a stereo and books, while the
others has shotgun shells, an ice chest and a deer
feeder. And whether ones campus is in an
institution of higher learning, or just a higher position
(i.e., a tower deer blind), there are similarities among
fraternities at each.
The first might be freshman orientation. For a country
boy like me, the thought of going from a senior high
graduating class of 42 to a campus with over 5000
students was gut-wrenching. Never mind that the campus at
Southwest Oklahoma State University would be swallowed
whole by a behemoth like Texas A&M. Freshman
orientation is your first chance to see just how strange
folks from the big city are, and what weird customs they
have. See any similarities about how you perceive
metroplex hunters bedecked in camo accented with a Bowie
knife?
Then theres the course catalog. You can forget
about most of the courses that look interesting, as
theyre already filled by the time you get to
enroll. Your first year will be replete with the various
"101s" and youll be lucky to get a
lecturer who even speaks the same dialect as you do. At
times you wonder if this place is out to help you, or out
to get you. Labs and quizzes, reports and minutia. But,
if you stay focused and work hard, soon things begin to
line out and you learn to negotiate the hurdles of
academia.
Its been 25 years since my freshman orientation,
and if Ive learned one thing, its to try and
keep education simple. While latin names and various
"-ologies" have their place on the campus,
simplicity and common sense have tenure on the back
forty. Keep your philosophies simple, your jargon
country-fied, and above all, enjoy your work. The
enthusiasm may prove contagious.
In 1978 I was introduced to the writings of Aldo
Leopold, who we in wildlife circles revere as the
"father" of wildlife management. Now
heres a guy with whom I could relate, even if I did
have to consult a dictionary every so often to look up a
term. His writings made pleasurable readings, and had
meat on the bone. His 1933 classic, "Game
Management," has earned biblical status for wildlife
managers and his collection of essays, "A Sand
County Almanac," (published in 1948) are to
biologists what "The Time It Never Rained" has
become to Kelton-philiacs.
Chapter 1 of "Game Management" has a quote
that I recite often when speaking with landowners about
wildlife management: "Game can be restored by the
creative use of the same tools which have heretofore
destroyed it; the axe, plow, cow, fire and gun."
As land, livestock and wildlife managers, it behooves
us to understand these basic tools and the framework
(i.e., applied ecology) in which they operate.
Leopolds "axe" meant timber management
to him, but I extend it to brush management for those of
us dealing with rangelands. In Texas, brush control is
the single most important land management decision that
affects the density and diversity of wildlife, in my
opinion. And while fence-to-fence control hamstrings
wildlife habitat, the planned, selective control of brush
(e.g., Brush Sculptors) is indeed one of the best ways of
manipulating habitat.
The plow in Leopolds time had caused widespread
open wounds to much of the Great Plains, and in the 1930s
we reaped the price for such error. I use the
"plow" to talk about practices like reseeding,
CRP, and disking to stimulate forbs for quail. Same tool,
but operating at different scales.
The cow in Leopolds vernacular remains virtually
unchanged. Leopold had seen arid rangelands and tallgrass
prairies hopelessly overstocked, whether from ignorance
or greed. And while much of Texas rangelands are
still overstocked, we have learned to use planned,
controlled grazing as one of the best tools for managing
plant succession. Today we know how to use cows (and
other livestock) as self-sustaining (and sometimes
profitable) means for creating the patchwork of
herbaceous species that promote a diversity of wildlife.
Granted, that knowledge is not always empowered on the
back forty.
Leopolds inclusion of "fire" must have
really seemed like blasphemy to resource managers of his
era. Indeed, it would take another 40 years before
foresters talked seriously about restoring the use of
fire as a tool in forest (or range) management. But he
knew that fire did have a place and that we just had to
determine where and when that place was.
And last, there was the gun. Whether Leopold was
referring to the need for population control of ungulates
(e.g., deer and elk), or forecasting the significance of
hunting-generated revenues (i.e., the Pittman-Robertson
Act) as a means of funding wildlife conservation, I
cannot say. But by rallying a conservation ethic in
landowners and sportsmen, he helped to ensure that there
would always be wild places.
Leopolds writings have provided me with an ad
libitum supply of "silver bullets." Whether
its his chiding that "the urge to comprehend
must precede the urge to reform," or his admonition
that "to keep every cog and wheel is the first
precaution of intelligent tinkering," he makes me do
something that I hope to get my students to do likewise
Think.
Therell be an opportunity for thinking at an
upcoming field day sponsored by the Texas Section,
Society for Range Management and the Texas Chapter, The
Wildlife Society. Entitled "Range Management 101: a
primer for livestock and wildlife managers," this
all-day tour of ranches will hone in on Leopolds
concepts of the axe, plow, cow, fire and gun, and how
these tools can be applied to enhance wildlife and
livestock production from Central Texas rangelands. For
more information about the field day, go to the TEXNAT
website (http://texnat.tamu.edu), or call Tamara Trail
(915-653-4576) or Ellis Klett (915-869-5141).
It will be my opportunity to open the days
lesson with a short talk that I call "In Search of
Camouflaged Cowboy Hats." My jargon will be
country-fied; my philosophies simple; my metaphors
meaningful; my silver bullets largely Leopold, sweetened
perhaps with some by my main man Will Rogers.
And participants will have but one assignment for the
rest of the day ... to think! Hope to see you there.
|