Urban Sprawl Affecting Ag
Use In More Ways Than One
STILLWATER, Okla. Though a decade
or two behind Texas, urban sprawl is slowly but surely
engulfing parts of Oklahoma, and this university town is
right in the middle.
"Oklahoma has less of a problem than, say,
Texas," says Oklahoma State University range
scientist Dr. Dave Engle.
"Whats happening here is almost an exact
replication of what happened between San Antonio and
Austin 20 or so years ago. We have a corridor from Tulsa
to Oklahoma City, and Stillwater is right in the middle
of it."
Extension personnel recently conducted a survey of
Payne County producers which showed that they viewed
urban sprawl as their number one problem, in part because
it has skewed the price of land in the area. Rangeland
generally sells for a couple of hundred dollars an acre.
That same land, if sold for development purposes, will
fetch $1000 an acre on the low end to $3000 an acre on
areas with more trees.
"The difference between good ag land and good
recreation land is night and day," Engle says.
"The best thing if you want to develop an area is
let it grow up. The more the trees, the more its
worth."
An economic brush study conducted at OSU indicated
herbicide control actually devalued land because it did
what it was supposed to do, kill trees, and in turn
lowered the aesthetic value of the property.
Oftentimes, ranchers are forced to sell their land
just to keep from declaring bankruptcy.
"Ranchers cant afford to lease the land,
much less buy it," Engle says. "When they look
at their options keeping their land in production
for $300 an acre as opposed to selling it for development
for $3000 an acre well, theres only one real
option."
He also notes that most metropolitan areas are in the
eastern part of the U.S., where the most productive land
is located.
A few years ago, OSU built a $4.3 million golf course
which was actually under budget. When it opened, it
became the number one public golf course in the nation.
Today, $500,000 homes are being built around Karsten
Creek. Builders are required to adhere to certain buffer
zones. For example, a house cant be built in view
of the golf course. Buyers seem to have little
appreciation for the danger that goes with this so-called
aesthetic beauty, experts caution. The practice in many
of these new housing additions is just to cut enough
trees out of the "forest" to build a house.
"People have cedar trees growing into the eaves
of their homes," OSU experimental ranch manager John
Weir remarks. "When it burns, their house is
gone."
Despite that danger, Engle and Weir say its
still hard for fire departments and citizens alike to
understand the importance and value of conducting
prescribed burns. Areas managed with periodic prescribed
fires, Engle notes, are at less risk from wildfires.
"Unfortunately, the best education for some is a
catastrophic fire," Engle says.
Urban sprawl not only affects landowners who are
trying to make a living off their land, it also has an
indirect impact on scientists trying to conduct various
kinds of range related research. The golf course and new
housing addition are just a mile or two from OSUs
Cross Timbers Experimental Ranch. Engle says within five
years houses will border their research lands. Scientists
involved with prescribed burning research at the
experimental Ranch, in particular, are worried that
sooner than later, urban sprawl will prevent them from
conducting any kind of prescribed burns, whether for
management or research purposes.
There are all kinds of moral and ethical issues
dealing with urban sprawl, Engle says. For example, the
state recently passed a $300 million transportation bill
which means the state now has funding to build new roads
in previously inaccessible areas. All taxpayers, rich and
poor, pay for the impact of urban sprawl.
"Now they want to take sewer water from
Stillwater to Karsten creek some 15 miles away. Who pays
for that?" Engle asks. "Every resident who
lives in Stillwater. The guys with middle to low income
are paying for high income affluent citizens to have
water and police and fire and paved roads in these newly
accessible areas."
Conservation easements, experts say, are the only way
lands can be kept from being subdivided. A conservation
easement essentially means that the owner of the land
signs away his development rights.
"With a conservation easement, at least the
rangeland would be retained," Engle says. "Once
its in concrete and houses, its over. You
cant go back."
Research conducted by OSU Extension range specialist
Dr. Terry Bidwell and others shows that one of the most
negative things done to land is to break it up into small
ownerships.
"Payne County was settled during the land run,
and every ownership is 160 acres," Bidwell explains.
"That is a non-sustainable agriculture operation.
Thats nothing more than a hobby. It might return
about three percent. It does not make a payment. A big
cow herd in this part of the state would be 100 head.
Most are 25 head."
There are some on the east and west coasts who have
tried to prevent development through legislation, but
Bidwell is of the opinion that legislating such things is
not a successful way to handle problems. Some of the
national and statewide organizations interested in
private property rights and agricultural interests alike
now believe conservation easements might be a viable
option.
In the end, Bidwell says everyone in society must
realize that "every right also has a
responsibility."
Engle fears that with continued urban sprawl, the
future of range management and the role that range
scientists play in managing and educating the public
about natural resources and the ecosystem will be forever
changed.
"Range scientists will be managing smaller and
smaller tracts of land," Engle remarks. "The
kind of stuff that we do, the applied research, is an
endangered species all its own," he adds,
"because its getting harder and harder to get
funding to do this kind of research."
The specialist says he isnt banking on the
growth of urban sprawl slowing anytime soon, but instead
is preparing for the changes that will affect his
profession.
"The cost of gasoline will have to go sky high
before people will quit commuting," Engle remarks.
"It will have to get so high, though, that it will
likely never happen."
|