Feedlots Explain Captive Sale
Boycott Position To Customers
(Editors note: The following letter came to
us from a reader, who received it in turn from a feedlot
where he is a customer. It explains the position of those
feedlots who have chosen to participate in the current
captive cattle boycott.)
DEAR CATTLE FEEDER:
WOULD YOU HELP?
I am sure that in recent weeks you have heard a lot
about the "Great Nebraska Formula/Grid Out."
Kansas and Colorado have also joined the movement, and
Texas is discussing it. There is a lot of misinformation
about what is trying to be done, and what the cattle
feeder can do to help. Keep reading, I will attempt to
explain the problem as we see it and what we need to do
to help solve the problem.
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? Three to four years ago,
feeders became concerned about what we called Captive
Supply. We felt that this gave the packer an unfair
advantage when purchasing cattle for slaughter, but at
that time we were uncertain how to define captive supply
and many of us really did not think it was that big of a
deal. Back then captive supply was reported at about
15-30 percent of the weekly sales volume and we assumed
that with 70 percent of the market non-captive, we, the
feeder, still had the bargaining power needed to get top
dollar for our cattle. Today we can see that things have
changed drastically, to the point where the packing
industry now controls more than 50 percent of the cattle
under some form of captive supply.
Just what is CAPTIVE SUPPLY? Captive supply
covers all cattle committed to a packer more than seven
days prior to slaughter and/or cattle on which the price
is not set prior to leaving the feed yard, which covers:
1. Formula or grid sales where the base price is not
negotiated on a weekly basis.
2. Forward contracted cattle.
3. Packer fed and/or financed cattle.
4. Cattle sold for delivery over seven days from time
of sale.
5. Cattle sold to the packer at the "high of the
week" or some variation thereof.
6. Any cattle on which price is not negotiated prior
to shipment.
Cattle shipped to the packer by any of the above
methods provide packers with non-negotiated, and in most
cases non-reported, live inventories. This gives the
packer an inventory tool that he uses to perfection when
negotiating a price on the remaining cattle. Because
most, if not all, of the above-mentioned marketing
alternatives rely on the cash market to set their base
price or starting point, we believe that it would
obviously be to the feeder's advantage to negotiate all
cattle on a weekly basis, forcing the packer to bid on
all of their needs rather than on just 30-50 percent of
them. This does not mean that cattle cannot be sold on a
grid or formula, but does require the establishing of a
cash basis before the cattle are turned in to the packer
and requires that the cattle are to be slaughtered within
seven days of the negotiated base price.
One of the practices that is hardest to understand is
selling cattle on the high of the week. The Nebraska
cattlemen believe that as many as 15 percent of their
weekly sales are priced this way and we believe the
figures would be similar in Kansas and Texas. This
involves the feed yard allowing the packer to pick up
cattle at the beginning of the week to be priced on
Friday by the packer based on his or the industry's
average price for that week. Let's follow this through
I ship my cattle to the packer Monday, Tuesday,
and Wednesday so he can keep his slaughter going while he
negotiates a live price on the few remaining cattle
selling on the open market. On Friday, when the packer
averages the price on the cattle that he bought in the
live market, he prices my cattle and puts the check in
the mail. I receive the check on Monday and get credit
for it in my bank Wednesday or Thursday. I don't know if
float means anything to you, but I guarantee it works to
the packers advantage, not to mention the fact that
my cattle have helped the packer negotiate tougher on the
few cattle left in the open market. My question is, do
you, the feeder, know that your feed yard manager is
selling your cattle this way, or do you think he is just
doing a great job of getting the top of the market each
week? Some yards get $.25 to $.50 above the weekly top.
This makes good coffee shop bragging rights, but if it
helps drive the market dollars lower are you sure
its worth it?
WHAT CAN BE DONE? If you, the feeder, are tired
of taking dollars less than what the packer can pay for
your cattle and you, like we, believe that captive
supplies work to our disadvantage, then put the manager
of the yard, or yards, where you feed on the spot. Find
out how they are marketing their cattle, all of their
cattle, and if you don't agree then let your voice be
heard by feeding where the manager is still doing all he
can to force the price up by causing the packers to
compete weekly for cattle. If you will help by voting
with your feeder cattle placements and we can get out
into the country and discourage these practices, we
believe we can change things. Let's make the packer get
back out and work for his inventory each and every week
of the year. Our future in the cattle business depends on
us!
The Committee For Kansans Against Captive Supply
|