NCBA Decides Not To Support
Legal Action Against Imports
DENVER The National Cattlemen's Beef
Association executive committee has voted against a
petition seeking legal action to restrict live cattle
imports from Canada and Mexico.
Meeting via conference call, dues members of the
committee voted nine to five Tuesday not to support the
Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Foundation (R-CALF)
petition requesting the U.S. government file a
countervailing duty case against Canada. Because no
motions were made, the Executive Committee did not vote
on R-CALF petitions requesting that the U.S. government
file anti-dumping cases against Mexico and Canada.
"Fair trade is vitally important to the future of
the U.S. beef industry, and its importance becomes
greater during the poor market conditions we're enduring
now," said NCBA president-elect George Swan.
"Trade issues between our neighbors to the north
and south, however, must be addressed in a fair,
aggressive, expedient and efficient manner. We feel
ongoing efforts to resolve these issues bilaterally,
especially when the threat of legislative actions are
forcing the Canadian and Mexican governments to respond,
must be fully exhausted before employing multi-year,
multi-million dollar lawsuits," said the Rogerson,
Idaho, cattleman.
Although it is unusual for a matter of this nature to
be considered outside its normal policy-development
process, NCBA's International Markets Committee met by
conference call October 9 to consider the R-CALF
petitions, but voted 69 to 17 against recommending NCBA
support.
Committee chairman Dana Hauck, Delphos, Kan., outlined
several factors that led the International Markets
Committee to its decision:
To win, the petitioning U.S. industry must show
(1) that the subject imports are being either dumped or
unfairly subsidized; and (2) that the imports are causing
or threatening the domestic industry with material
injury. The remedy provided by both laws is the
imposition of an offsetting duty on the import at the
time it is brought into the United States, but provides
no direct relief to the U.S. cattlemen.
Devaluation of the Canadian dollar has reduced
the price of Canadian cattle in terms of U.S. dollars.
The Canadian dollar has devalued from approximately
$.82/US in 1989, when the U.S./Canadian Trade Agreement
was signed, to approximately $.67/US.
NCBA asked outside legal experts to examine potential
benefits, costs and risks associated with the R-CALF
request. Filing antidumping and countervailing duty cases
would likely cost more than $1 million each, take seven
to 14 months to resolve and stand less than a one in two
chance of success.
"We did not see merit in the R-CALF request at
this time when the risks and the costs are so high,"
Hauck said. "We feel aggressive efforts already
underway are the best alternatives to resolve the issues
and to maintain good relations with important trading
partners."
Hauck cited implementation of revised rules on October
1 to allow U.S. cattlemen to ship more feeder cattle into
Canadian feedlots. The rules waive specific animal
testing requirements to make cross-border shipment of
live cattle more accessible to U.S. cattle producers.
"This is a perfect example of how diligence and
hard negotiations can result in fair trading
practices," he said. "This success was the
result of coordinated efforts of state and national
industry representatives, Montana and Washington state
officials, U.S. government officials and Canadian
officials."
Swan noted that Mexico has been a long-term supplier
of feeder cattle to U.S. cattlemen and is now our
second-largest and fastest growing export market for U.S.
beef.
"We co-sponsored with the Mexican cattlemen a
symposium for retailers and distributors to increase
demand for beef in Mexico and worked with USDA to provide
GSM-103 credit guarantees for Mexican cattlemen to
purchase U.S. breeding cattle following severe drouth.
NCBA will continue to work with the Mexican cattle
industry and government officials to assure that this
vital two-way trade continues.
"We have made significant strides in trade issues
with Canada and Mexico," Swan said. "We
prevented cattle from Australia entering the U.S. through
Mexico, beef exports have increased to Mexico, and we
made progress in getting country-of-origin meat labeling
on beef imports considered by Congress."
Swan said NCBA priorities now include:
Work with USDA and Congress to determine
possible options on rescinding U.S. quality grades on
Canadian imports and implementing country-of-origin meat
labeling on imports.
Work to assure that Mexican feeder cattle meet
U.S. animal health standards.
Expand the movement of more cattle north to
Canada.
Ensure that Canadian Wheat Board practices do
not provide cost of grain advantage to the Canadian
livestock industry.
Host a trade team from Mexico to increase
understanding of U.S. feedlots, packing plants and border
inspection processes.
Expedite rulemaking that will allow Canada to
recognize Disease Free Regions in the U.S. that can ship
cattle to Canada.
Ensure harmonization on animal drug issues.
At the request of Canadian cattlemen, a summit between
the two countries will be held October 19 in Denver to
begin discussing these and other issues relating to trade
between Canada and the United States. Details for the
summit will be released soon.
|