Judge Dumps Limits
On Aquifer Pumping
SAN ANTONIO (AP) A judge has opened the
floodgates on the Edwards Aquifer.
Ruling in a lawsuit filed by catfish farmers and
irrigators, state District Judge Joseph Hart said pumping
limits were illegally adopted. Thus, the plaintiffs may
use as much water as their individual all-time annual
highs.
Hart ruled in Austin that the authority failed to
properly adopt its rules that establish who gets how much
water under a state law regulating withdrawals from the
Edwards Aquifer, San Antonio's sole source of drinking
water.
The judge's opinion was rendered in a four-page letter
faxed to attorneys involved in two lawsuits challenging
the rules, the San Antonio Express-News reports.
Hart said the authority failed to follow the state's
Administrative Procedure Act by not having a written
order giving "reasoned justification" for the
rules when it adopted them Jan. 20.
"The lack of that document was the reason the
rules were invalidated," said Greg Ellis, the
authority's general manager.
Ellis and his staff were to use the rules to determine
how much water each pumper gets while also trying to stay
within the legislatively-suggested annual maximum
withdrawal of 450,000 acre-feet.
An acre-foot is 325,851 gallons, enough to supply the
needs of two average families of four for a year.
Under the interim pumping authorization set out by the
act creating the authority, pumpers can take out up to
the maximum they withdrew in any one year between 1972
and 1993.
That collectively amounts to 792,000 acre-feet,
although the most ever pumped in one year was 542,000
acre-feet.
Observers said that even without formulas in place to
limit pumping, Tuesday's decision shouldn't lead to
excessive water use before the two year-old authority can
adopt new rules by next spring.
Russ Johnson, attorney for the San Antonio Water
System, the aquifer's largest pumper at about 175,000
acre-feet a year, said the decision "represents an
unfortunate delay, but I think it's imminently
correctable: readopt the rules in strict compliance with
the procedural rules."
|