Fears Of Corporations Aired
At Ag Concentration Hearing
WASHINGTON (AP) Independent family farmers
will be replaced by a ``seamless system'' where big
companies produce everything from seed to the shelf
unless steps are taken to halt the pace of consolidation
in agriculture, a farm group warns.
``We believe concentration will do more to influence
the future structure of agriculture in the United States
than the next farm bill,'' Leland Swenson, president of
the 300,000-member National Farmers Union, told the House
Agriculture Committee Thursday.
``Many predict that we will soon have a system where
three or four companies control the food and fiber system
at every level, from the seed supply until the time it
reaches the consumer,'' Swenson said.
The hearing was the latest on the concentration issue.
Concerns about the number of mergers in agriculture have
risen since Cargill Inc. of Minnetonka, Minn., the
nation's No. 1 grain company, announced plans in November
to buy the worldwide operations of second-ranked
Continental Grain Co.
With already low prices in both livestock and
commodities markets, many lawmakers and farm groups worry
that the Cargill-Continental deal, which is being
reviewed by the Justice Department, will further depress
prices for farmers.
``We can't continue to put the squeeze on those at the
bottom of the production chain,'' said Rep. Charles
Stenholm, D-Texas.
Harry L. Pearson, president of the Indiana Farm
Bureau, said the American Farm Bureau is concerned that
concentration could lead to inadequate market access but
has not taken a position on the Cargill-Continental deal.
But the National Farmers Union, which has called for a
moratorium on mergers until the impact on agriculture is
determined, painted a dimmer picture of what it calls
``the industrialization of agriculture'' in a study it
released by a team of University of Missouri rural
sociologists.
In the livestock industry, four large firms in each
sector are slaughtering four out of five beef cattle,
three out of four sheep, three out of five hogs and half
of all chickens, the study said.
In fact, 95 percent of all chickens are processed
under production contracts a trend that
concentration critics fear could stretch to other areas
of livestock.
``The farmer becomes the grower, providing the labor
and often some of the capital, but never owning the
product as it moves through the food system and never
making management decisions,'' the report said.
The report also raised concerns about a ``seamless
system'' where companies control products from ``gene to
shelf.'' Such clusters are already forming, the authors
wrote, pointing to an alliance between Monsanto, one of
the leading biotechnology firms, and Cargill.
Another example of a major food chain player is
ConAgra, the report said, noting the company has
subsidiaries along most links in the food chain.
Still, Mark Drabenstott, an economist who heads the
Center for the Study of Rural America at the Federal
Reserve Bank of Kansas City, told lawmakers that
consolidation in agriculture is ``generally a positive
trend'' that leads to lower-priced and higher quality
food for consumers.
``Farmers face a simple test: Build new relationships
or be left out of the game,'' Drabenstott said.
|