Researcher Sees Some Slowing
In Decline For Beef DemandCHARLOTTE, North
Carolina For the first time in 20 years, the
downward shift in demand for beef is showing signs of
slowing.
So said Dr. Wayne Purcell, an ag economist at Virginia
Tech. Speaking at the recent Cattle Industry Annual
Convention and Trade Show here, Purcell attributed the
slowing of decline in part to programs funded with beef
checkoff dollars and to consumers' willingness to pay for
products that meet their expectations for convenience,
consistency and quality.
"It's the most encouraging thing I've seen in the
past 20 years," said Purcell. "Some of the
programs the beef industry is putting forth are starting
to work, as well as the efforts of private firms which
are putting out more convenient pre-cooked products.
"The modern consumer will pay for quality,
consistency and convenience, and they will pay the kinds
of prices that will make producers a profit for a
change," he said.
Purcell's presentation was based on research completed
in January with the Beef Demand Study Group. The study
worked with recognized researchers, including Purcell, to
identify the primary "drivers" of beef demand.
The following drivers were identified: food safety;
palatability; health and nutrition; consumer friendly
products (convenience); cost efficiencies; and value
enhancement.
Beef demand has fallen steadily since the late 1970s
but has slowed during the 1990s. Purcell's message was
good news for the beef industry, but it included a
cautionary note:
"The industry needs to be careful about relaxing
its vigil. Demand has plummeted in dramatic fashion since
about 1980, and we have a long way to get back to a
profitable and growing industry," he said.
"Consumers have moved to an on-the-go-lifestyle
where convenient meal preparation is important. They
worry about fat and cholesterol in their diets. They want
high quality and they increasingly demand consistent
quality," he said.
"In beef, the need to move the fresh beef product
offering toward the needs and preferences of the modern
consumer is readily apparent."
The Beef Demand Study Group also identified several
important consumer demographics which affect buying
preferences. Demographics which have impacted beef demand
during the last 20 years include age; household income;
household size; education; employment; and rural versus
urban location.
The prolonged decrease in demand for fresh beef
appears to be associated largely with preference issues,
not with the impact of changing relative prices of
substitutes or changing consumer incomes, Purcell said.
(That is a positive finding, at least relative to
poultry, against which beef cannot realistically compete
price-wise. It also makes sense, given the fact that
potentially cheap poultry is just as costly as beef when
put up in the "value-added" forms in which it
currently sells most readily: pre-breaded chicken strips,
"buffalo wings," and the like. Does anyone
still see whole fryers anymore? Can today's
kitchen-phobic consumer even cut one up? Ed.)
In some cases, changes in demographic factors have
directly impacted many of the product drivers. While the
industry cannot directly affect these demographic
factors, appropriate responses need to be developed to
stabilize demand, according to the Beef Demand Study
Group.
The Study Group believes that there will be no demand
for beef unless consumers perceive that it is safe. They
also believe that consumers' concerns over health and
nutrition continue to have a substantial negative impact
on beef demand and should be addressed by the industry.
All demand drivers, they noted, must be addressed to
halt the declining demand for beef. Focusing on one area
alone will not accomplish the task.
"The major need is for change, investments, and
programs to move toward a consumer-friendly product
offering," Purcell said. "If these things are
not done, beef will continue to lose market share with a
major loss in 1999 now largely predetermined. The loss of
market share not demand will come from
decreased cyclical beef supplies and increased supplies
of competing meats."
|