Takings Suits On Eco Rulings
Have Activists Screaming Foul
PORTLAND, Ore. Grasping environmental activists
may see their long string of legal victories come back to
bite them, or at least haunt them.
Two decades of successful venue-shopping for friendly
courts has allowed eco-extremists to claim a number of
"endangered species" victories that have shut
down productive enterprise in a variety of industries,
from timber and mining to ranching.
Now they face the possibility that they or more
likely, the taxpayers may eventually have to pay
for the damage that's been done. And the prospect has
them gnashing their teeth.
Lawsuits seeking compensation for damages over
protection of the spotted owl in Oregon could lead to a
financial fallout that the activists claim threatens the
protection of other wildlife.
A state appeals court heard arguments last week in a
lawsuit filed by Boise Cascade Corp., which wants the
court to uphold a $1.8 million award that said the state
should compensate the company for preventing it from
harvesting a parcel of old-growth timber where a pair of
spotted owls nested.
If the appeals court rules in Boise Cascade's favor,
activists moan that the state's efforts to protect
wildlife and fish, including salmon, could be put at
risk.
They say that whenever a private party suffered an
economic loss due to one of Oregon's habitat-preservation
programs, the state would have to cut a check.
Already, the Boise Cascade case has spurred two
similar suits by timberland owners in the state.
``You are just seeing the tip of the litigation
iceberg,'' Daniel Kearns, a lawyer for the Portland
Audubon Society, told The Wall Street Journal
Northwest Edition for a story published last
Thursday.
Should the firm prevail in the appeals court and the
suits pile up, Kearns said ``it is going to make a host
of restrictions the state places on timber, on keeping
streams clean to protect fish, even on hunting laws, too
expensive to afford.''
(Duh. Ed.)
Oregon Deputy Attorney General David Schuman agrees.
``It would make it very difficult to keep teeth in our
environmental laws,'' he said.
The question before the judges in Salem is whether
Oregon must make amends with Boise Cascade by reimbursing
it for the lumber the company said it would have been
able to sell if the state hadn't issued a series of
logging moratoriums on 56 acres the company owns in
Clatsop County.
The moratoriums were in effect from January 1993 to
October 1997. The company argues that the state's actions
amounted to a ``taking'' of private property.
The state's argument is that its duty to preserve
wildlife for the general public overrides
private-property rights when a species is supposedly
endangered.
That claim runs directly counter to the U.S.
Constitution's Fifth Amendment, however, and the U.S.
Supreme Court has ruled in several cases that landowners
can be compensated for the loss of the use of their land
for environmental protections.
But the Boise Cascade case is the first time Oregon
would decide the case for the state.
And while federal regulations also would have
prevented the company from logging its Oregon land, state
officials were the first place where the company
encountered a roadblock.
The taking of property rights has rankled Northwest
timber operators since 1990, when the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service declared the northern spotted owl a
"threatened" species.
Since then, the harvest on 19 federal forests in
Oregon and Washington has fallen by 82.6 percent to 662
million board feet in 1998 from 3.8 billion in 1990,
according to the U.S. Forest Service.
After the federal listing, the state which
declared the spotted owl threatened in 1987 also
moved to preserve the animal's nesting grounds on private
property.
"The bottom line is that if we are going to
require timber companies to place off-limits a certain
portion of land to protect owls, salmon or other
wildlife, then that is a taking and they are going
to be compensated,'' said Chris West, vice president of
the Portland-based Northwest Forestry Association, a
group of 60 timber and lumber companies in Oregon and
Washington.
|