Lawmaker Vows Measure To End
Funding For Predator Control
WASHINGTON (AP) U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio is
leading a charge to cut funding for a program in which
federal officials kill animals, mainly coyotes, that prey
upon sheep and other livestock.
DeFazio, D-Ore., said the program, which allows
authorities to shoot predators from airplanes or place
poison baits on the ground (DeFazio is at least 25
years out of date on that one; we wonder what else he
knows that just ain't so? Ed.), is
indiscriminate, resulting in the deaths of household
pets, eagles and other innocent creatures.
But he mostly faults the federal wildlife services
program for what he contends is an unfair subsidy to
ranchers. DeFazio said cattle owners should have to take
care of their own pest problems rather than rely on the
government.
``If you got termites in your house, wildlife services
doesn't show up to take care of your termites,'' DeFazio
said. ``Why should they show up at a few private ranches
to kill predators?''
He plans to offer an amendment on the House floor this
month to cut $7 million from the Agriculture Department
program. That represents the portion of the wildlife
services budget that DeFazio believes benefits ranchers.
But backers of the program say it not only helps
ranchers, but airports that want to keep runways clear of
animals, urban and suburban parents who worry about wild
animals harming their children, and the public at large
that worries about diseases spread by animals.
The agriculture industry accounts for a third or less
of the $12.8 billion in damages that problem animals
cause each year, according to the American Sheep Industry
Association.
``When Mr. DeFazio tells you this is a subsidy for
Western ranchers he is not being completely honest with
you,'' said Tom McDonnell, director of natural resources
for the group.
DeFazio and Rep. Charles Bass, R-N.H., plan to offer
their amendment to a $61 billion agriculture
appropriations bill, which could spark a vigorous debate
on the House floor.
A year ago, at DeFazio's urging, the House cut $10
million from the predator program by a 229-193 vote.
But after some arm twisting by farm groups,
Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman and other allies of
the program, the House reversed itself a day later.
One of the program's biggest allies is Rep. Joe Skeen,
R-N.M., a senior member of the House Appropriations
Committee and rancher who has gained benefits from the
program.
Skeen recognizes the broader importance of controlling
predators, such as how the program helps keep meat prices
low by protecting cattle, said Skeen's spokeswoman, Selma
Sierra.
``Wildlife services is a benefit for every citizen in
the country,'' she said.
The program in 1997 led to 146,000 deaths of 23 types
of animals, but more than half of the deaths, 82,000,
were coyotes, according to wildlife services program
figures.
Other animals killed included 31,000 beavers, 7300
raccoons and 6800 skunks.
Defenders of Wildlife, an environmental activist group
that backs DeFazio's effort, claims authorities often
fail to kill the dominant pair of coyotes, the ones
responsible for killing, and mistakenly take out innocent
coyotes that are not causing problems.
``This program is run so that it basically wipes out
anything on or near a ranch,'' said Caroline Kennedy,
program associate for the group. (Now we wonder
whether Kennedy gets her "facts" from DeFazio,
or the other way around. We also wonder why the
Associated Press would print such pablum as legitimate
comment. Ed.)
But others say wildlife services has been successful
in focusing on troublesome animals.
``They are targeting their operations where they are
receiving complaints,'' said Jason Campbell, executive
director of the Public Lands Council, which represents
agriculture interests.
|