Agriculture Aid Bill Passes
House, Awaits Senate Action
(Editor's note: Initial expectations were that the
Senate would vote as early as Monday on the agriculture
aid bill hammered out last week in conference committee
and quickly approved by the full House. As of presstime
Wednesday, however, that apparently had not happened.)
WASHINGTON (AP) The U.S. House has agreed
to the second big farm bailout in as many years, $8.7
billion in relief for producers battered by bad weather
and the worldwide grain glut.
If the Senate gives its approval, which was expected
this week, the measure goes to President Clinton for his
signature. The first checks could go out later this
month.
``Farmers can't wait. They need assistance now,'' said
Rep. Joe Skeen, R-N.M. The House on Friday approved the
measure 240-175.
Most of the money will go to grain and cotton farmers
to compensate for a second year of depressed market
prices, and there is $1.2 billion for producers who lost
crops to drouth and floods.
But the measure also offers special relief for other
producers including a tax break for sugar farmers
and $328 million in special subsidies for tobacco growers
as well as deals for some people who don't even
farm:
Low-income fishermen around Alaska's Norton
Sound will get $15 million.
The city of Stroud, Okla., which was hit by a
tornado this spring, won't have to pay back some
government loans.
Sled dog owners in Alaska. The bill would
require the Agriculture Department to reconsider rules
requiring that the dogs be kept in pens, rather than tied
up.
But the focus was on farmers, and some House members
complained the bill didn't provide enough money for those
they said needed help most: farmers and livestock
producers hurt by the drouth and flooding.
Much of the cash would go to well-off farmers and
landowners who don't need assistance, said Rep. Marcy
Kaptur, D-Ohio. ``Some of these people aren't the ones
who are truly hurting in this economy.''
Others were unhappy the GOP leaders refused to
consider allowing sales of food and medicine to Cuba or
to block the government's new milk-pricing rules.
Many saw the bill as evidence that the market-oriented
1996 farm law has failed. The law was supposed to wean
farmers from dependence on government subsidies. Last
year's bailout cost nearly $6 billion.
``I wonder how much longer we can go on like this,''
said Rep. Charles Stenholm, D-Texas.
Most major farm groups, however, just want Congress to
finish work on the aid package. Disputes over the Cuba
and dairy issues stalled its progress for more than a
week.
``This bill is far from perfect, but it represents the
best chance for getting assistance to producers in an
expeditious manner,'' said Dean Kleckner, president of
the American Farm Bureau Federation.
The money is included in a $69 billion appropriations
bill for operations of USDA, with its myriad agriculture
and nutrition programs, and the Food and Drug
Administration.
Sen. Robert Torricelli, D-N.J., says the bill provides
insufficient disaster relief for his state and has
threatened to filibuster it. But Sen. Pat Roberts,
R-Kan., said he expected the Senate to approve it with
little delay.
Of the $8.7 billion in farm aid, about $7 billion is
for compensation for low prices, including $5.5 billion
that would double the direct ``market transition''
payments that farmers get under the 1996 farm law.
Also in the bill:
A doubling of limits on subsidies farmers can
receive. An individual grower could claim up to $460,000
a year in subsidies, said the Center for Rural Affairs,
which opposes the higher limits.
A requirement that packers report what they pay
for cattle and hogs. Producers say that will make it
easier for them to bargain with the few companies
dominating meat processing.
$400 million to cut the cost of crop insurance.
$200 million for livestock producers hurt by
drouth.
$125 million in subsidies for dairy producers.
Another $500 million for hurricane-related farm losses
in North Carolina is in a separate spending bill for the
Department of Health and Human Services.
|