Studies Show Breeding, Calving
Dates Have Big Impact In Texas
By David Bowser
PLANO, Texas Environmental differences can
affect livestock production and must be taken into
account when planning a breeding calendar, says a beef
cattle specialist and research scientist.
Different areas have different types of grasses,
different soils, and different amounts of rainfall, says
Dr. L.R. Sprott, Texas A&M University professor and
Extension beef cattle scientist. What might be an ideal
calving period in the Midwest could be a wreck in Texas.
"Be aware of what your environment is,"
Sprott admonishes.
What's right for one rancher may be different for
another rancher in another region, Sprott told producers
at the Extension Service's annual Metroplex Cattlemen's
Conference this fall.
"You can hear all sorts of philosophies and
stories as you visit with different producers and
different educators," Sprott said.
Their philosophies and stories are probably right,
even though they differ from one to another.
"You're going to have to decide for yourself
based on the kind of environment you live in as to when
you should be breeding your cows and when they should
calve," he noted.
One of the important questions is how long the
breeding and calving seasons should be.
"Our philosophy a lot of times is the longer we
breed on these cattle, the more likely they are to get
pregnant," Sprott said.
While there is some merit to that philosophy, the
length of breeding season does not dictate whether or not
the cows get pregnant.
"What dictates pregnancy in these animals and
their ability to get pregnant is nutrition," Sprott
insisted. "I'm becoming more and more of a proponent
of good forage management. If we can develop forage
systems that will allow us to become less dependent on
high levels of supplement, that's really our goal, not
that we will never have to feed anything."
Producers have to develop systems that provide more
quantity and a little additional quality at times when
they really need it.
The time of year when cows calve directly affects the
types and timing of many herd management practices. The
start of calving is dictated by the start of breeding.
Cows calving in the fall normally need more supplemental
feed in the winter than do cows calving in the spring
unless cool season pastures are available. Unless
producers retain ownership of the calves past weaning,
fall-born calves will be marketed in the spring and
calves born in the spring will be marketed in the fall.
The decision of when to calve is complicated by
numerous factors, and ignoring these details can affect
costs of production, animal performance, income and
profitability, Sprott cautioned.
There is no single date that is best for the start of
calving because differences in climate can affect the
availability and conditions of natural resources, Sprott
said, but for Texas producers and those in the southern
United States, there are dates that probably should be
avoided.
There are several principles to remember concerning
breeding, Sprott continued.
Perhaps the first is the health of the herd, but
fertility among cows is also variable. Fertility is
highest in cows that conceive at first service. Cows
requiring more than two services during the breeding
period are the least fertile in the herd.
Ranchers have to identify and cull sub-fertile
animals. A cow that's seven years old and has produced
three calves probably needs to be sent to the sale barn.
Something else to consider, Sprott said, is narrowing
the calving season.
"It takes the age variability out of those
calves," Sprott pointed out.
When the producer takes the age variability out, he
takes the weight variability out.
Sprott admitted that costs went up as much as $70 a
cow in some of the research herds as ranchers implemented
such management changes, but he said production improved
by as much as 73 percent.
"They were producing more total pounds of beef
per animal than they were prior to that," Sprott
explained. "It effectively reduced their breakeven
cost of production by about 20 percent."
In other words, they were getting more production for
every dollar they spent.
Sprott said late-calving cows are late-conceiving
cows.
"They are the sub-fertile animals," he said.
If they are eliminated, it will increase the overall
fertility of the herd.
Producers must also recognize the importance of
properly feeding cows so they can show estrus early in
the breeding period. Cows which display estrus within the
first 21 days of breeding have higher pregnancy rates.
"What we'd like to do is identify our most
fertile cattle," Sprott said, "and provide an
adquate forage base so they can come in heat right quick,
early in the breeding season."
Pregnancy rates will increase in herds where the cows
come into heat quickly, Sprott contended, noting that
most pregnancies in a herd occur in cows with the highest
fertility.
Some 95 to 97 percent of all pregnancies are
attributed to cows conceiving at their first or second
estrus. Only three to five percent are attributed to cows
that conceive at their third estrus.
These principles regarding cow fertility lead to the
question of what month the breeding season should start
to optimize the chances that the most fertile cows will
conceive, Sprott said. This is extremely important, since
temperatures during certain months are stressful and can
reduce fertility.
Research data from studies in Kansas and Texas
indicate that if cows show their first estrus after the
month of June, the chances of conceiving are dramatically
reduced. In the two herds of Texas cattle studied, one
near Waco and one on the Gulf Coast, pregnancy rates in
cows showing their first estrus during July through
September were less than 17 percent. That indicates that
summer breeding in Texas is not recommended.
"Down on the Gulf Coast it does get ugly
quick," Sprott pointed out.
In hot weather, fertility drops in both cows and
bulls.
He said his research was the result of some studies in
Nebraska that favored breeding in July and August.
"I tell you," Sprott said, "July and
August in Nebraska ain't near what they are in
Texas."
He cautioned ranchers to understand their environment.
In far West Texas, it may take some late summer
showers to push the grass up to get the cattle onto a
higher plane of nutrition.
"West Texas Augusts are hot but not very
humid," Sprott pointed out. "Humidity is the
terrible factor on these cattle, especially when it's
hot, but even when it's cold."
Sprott said data from recent research in West Texas is
still being studied.
Central Texas cows bred during the months of November,
December and January have acceptable reproductive
performance.
"Temperatures during Central Texas winters are
not so stressful that fertility is compromised,"
Sprott noted.
The data also shows a lower pregnancy rate in herds
with nutritional problems. In those studies, when the
nutritional problems were corrected, herd pregnancy rates
improved.
"Proper nutrition is required," he
reiterated.
In a study of 500 calves born in the central and Gulf
Coast regions of Texas, data shows that performance drops
in calves born in the months from May through September.
Calves born in those months had adjusted weaning weights
below that of calves born in cooler months. August-born
calves were 124 pounds lighter than their April-born herd
mates. September-born calves were 99 pounds lighter than
their February-born peers, and August-born calves were 57
pounds lighter than their March and December-born
counterparts.
Targeting a specific month to calve based on this data
is not recommended since there is some variation in the
data between locations, but what can be gleaned from the
data is that high temperatures are stressful on
summer-born calves and will reduce their growth.
"Unless a producer can retain ownership of
summer-born calves, they are unlikely to generate
acceptable income," Sprott said.
Even then, data from a fourth Gulf Coast herd with
summer calves shows that summer calves would have to be
retained until they are 12 months old before they reach
an acceptable sale weight. Their herd mates reached that
weight at seven months of age.
Data suggests that calves born in the cold of
December, January and February suffer, but a look at
individual Central Texas ranches that are fall and winter
calvers suggests that as calving progresses from the cold
of December and January to the relatively warmer months
of February and March, there is a slight but not
significant improvement in calf performance. Sprott said
this implies that it usually does not get cold enough in
Central Texas to dramatically affect calf performance.
"This is completely contrary to what happens to
performance in winter-born calves in northern states
where temperatures are more severe and high death loss
and the potential for low growth rate in calves are a
major concern," Sprott said.
As calving progresses from the warmth of October to
the relative cool of November, calf performance in
Central Texas improves, but only slightly.
Sprott said if producers can stay away from extreme
cold or extreme heat, it should benefit calf performance.
"Maybe the most important thing to conclude from
the data is that stressful temperatures of both cold and
heat will affect calf performance," Sprott offered,
"and for calves in the central and Gulf Coast
regions of Texas, summer calving is not
recommended."
Research does not clearly identify a specific month to
calve and breed cows in Texas, Sprott reiterated, but
there is no question that summer calving, May through
September, in Central and South Texas will result in
significantly reduced calf performance.
It is also highly questionable, he said, that a drop
in calf performance ranging from 57 to 124 pounds in
summer-born calves is economically acceptable. In six
Texas trials, management steps to eliminate summer-born
calves and concentrate the calving season in the cooler
months of spring or fall resulted in a 74 percent
increase in production and a 20 percent reduction in
breakeven prices.
It is clear that fertility drops in cows being bred
after June and though September. Depending on location,
cows bred in May and June in the Gulf Coast region had
pregnancy rates about 30 points below those bred in
cooler months, while cows in the central and Gulf Coast
regions bred from July through September had pregnancy
rates from 60 to 65 points below cows bred in cooler
months.
"Summer breeding and summer calving in Central
and South Texas is not recommended," Sprott
concluded.
|